see.limtehonline.com

Ladies and gentlemen,

Let me introduce my current faculty, the Faculty of Human Ecology! I’m currently undergoing my Master studies in this faculty at Universiti Putra Malaysia. Just in case you wanna know what is the Faculty of Human Ecology all about, I’m posting this to let you know a little bit about it.

Faculty of Human Ecology was officially established on 1 April 1992 with the merger of the Department of Development Studies, from the Faculty of Agriculture with the Department of Social Science from the Faculty of Educational Studies. At that time, four departments were formed in Faculty of Human Ecology, that is Community Food and Health, Human Development Studies, Family Development Studies and Resources Management and Consumer Studies.

The history of the Department of Human Development Studies begun with the establishment of the Home Economic Unit as one of the Units in the Department of Extension Education, Faculty of Agriculture. In 1973 this unit was upgraded to a department, known as the Department of Food and Home Technology in Faculty of Agriculture. In 1978 this department was known as the Department of Home Technology and in 1980 it was known as the Department of Human Development Studies and it remains as one of the departments under the Faculty of Agriculture until now.

The Department of Social Science was initially known as the Unit of Social Science under the Department of Agriculture Extension, Faculty of Agriculture. In 1975 this unit was merged with the Education Unit and became the Department of Education and Social Science under the Faculty of Educational Studies. On 1 January 1982, the Department of Social Science was established with the restructuring of the Department of Education and Social Science.

In 1994, a change in the university’s new administrative era saw the move of the Department of Food and Community Health to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, which was newly established. At the same time the Department of Communication was moved from the Center of Expansion and Education Extension to a department in the Faculty of Human Ecology. Subsequently, in 1996 the Department of Music was added on to the Faculty of Human Ecology.

In 1999, the Faculty’s organizational structure took another turn, when the Department of Communication was moved to the Faculty of Modern Languages. In 2001, the Department of General Studies was established and subsequently upgraded as the Center of General Studies in January 2002. However the center was restructured in May 2003 to become a department in the Faculty, which it remains until now, as the Department of Government and Civilization Studies.

Currently FHE consists of five departments:
• Human Development and Family Studies
• Resource Management and Consumer Studies
• Social and Development Science
• Government and Civilization Studies
• Music

Apart from these departments there is also the External Education and Industrial Training Unit.

【本刊记者撰述】副首相兼财政部长纳吉昨天公布耗资马币六百亿元的第二经济振兴配套，民政党主席许子根认为这个“迷你预算案”应更重视提高生产力及提升技术能力，使国内经济更具长远的竞争力。

许子根今天发表声明说，第二振兴经济配套的大部分措施都是扩张性的财政政策，不是把重点放在提高生产力，尤其是在供应领域的经济，而从长远来看，如果生产力没有改善，扩张性政策可能会带来通货膨胀的压力。

“更重要的是，现在的挑战是兑现承诺及保证在执行过程中没有出现任何的浪费和流失，让人民获得最大的利益。”

许子根说，马来西亚人在公共交通方面（巴士发生故障等）浪费了很多时间，也面对一些政府部门行政事务出现繁文缛节的问题，尤其是市议会和区议会的规划和建筑、执照等部门。

许子根置疑政府是否有必要增加发给国产车的补贴，“为何政府不把这些补贴投资在公共交通系统？为何不用来改善公共交通系统，使国内的公共交通像新加坡、香港和澳洲般方便乘搭？为何不投资于绿色能源？”

许子根认为政府应拨出更多款额，以提升高等教育、研究生学位课程、讲师及研究生的素质；“国内大学的素质是非常重要的，以确保我国的大学能吸引精英人才及培育出最优秀的毕业生；这也是刺激经济対抗危机之余，投资在马来西亚的未来。”

黄锦河：西马预算案

另一方面，人民公正党砂拉越浮罗岸州议员黄锦河则非议，第二振兴经济配套给砂拉越的拨款实在“超迷你“，反映它只是一个”西马预算案”。

他说，第二振兴经济配套只拨区区2%即马币12亿元充作砂沙两州的基本设施发展及提升沙巴与砂拉越的经济，沙巴及砂拉越各得区区1%，而且砂州的拨款非但微不足道，而且过于含糊，小拨款中都还要和西马“分享”，更鲜明突出这只是西马预算案。

他说，“迷你预算案”显然对西马较有利，例如：在柔佛州依斯干达发展特区展开17亿元的投资、拨款20亿元在吉隆坡国际机场兴建一座新廉价机场、两亿五千万元扩充槟城机场、拨出四亿八千万元确保西马大道不会起价、一亿元在吉隆坡金三角地区的大厦之间建造空中桥梁和走道，以及登嘉楼的一千公顷养虾场和及金马伦高原的两千公顷现代蔬菜菜园。

黄锦河也说，经济配套的各项发展计划没有详细说明砂拉越可分配到多少，例如：

一、政府将提供准备16万3000个培训机会及安排在公共和私人领域工作，其中有多少安排给砂拉越？

二、二亿三千万元作为乡区水电供应发展经费，三亿五千万元为乡区道路提升工程经费，是否包括砂拉越乡区？

三、拨出两亿元建造廉价房屋给低收入一群，有多少建立在砂拉越？

四、19亿5000万元建造与修复752所学校，包括沙巴及砂拉越，其中三亿元用作维修宗教学校、华小及淡小。以区区三亿元分配给全国的华小、宗教学校及淡小，实在过于小气了；砂拉越华小的拨款更是不敢想象了。

五、额外提供两千万元作为提提升老人院、女性及儿童庇护中心的基建设备，这些最需要政府照顾的弱势群体却获取微不足道的拨款，显示国阵政府不重视福利工作。

六、拨出24亿元给多通讯与媒体超级委员会，在89个乡区提升通讯基建、设立宽频图书馆和通讯社区。这项提升通讯的服务是否让区域最为广阔，发展最落后的砂拉越有优先发展优势？

七、政府将斥资两亿元提升旅游胜地的基建，多元化旅游产品，举办更多国际峰会或展览。鉴于砂拉越的旅游业也大大落后于西马，这项计划是否同样发展砂州的旅游景点，以公平发展砂州的旅游业？

黄锦河表示，比起西马，砂拉越的发展仍然望尘莫及，因此政府理应优先发展砂州，才能确保东西马两岸的发展平衡；迷你预算案顾此失彼地厚待西马，对砂拉越很不公平。

他说，这个马来西亚史上最大笔的振兴经济配套以六百亿元救经济，是救西马经济，砂拉越受惠不大，依然陷在经济困境的谷底。

原文取自： http://www.merdekareview.com/news/n/9039.html

砂劳越啊！砂劳越！砂劳越的人民啊！你们何时才会醒悟呢？！醒醒吧！！！看清楚吧！！！别再那么的单纯了！！！唉～砂劳越人民的政治意识远不及西马的人民来得强啊！真是可悲啊！！！可悲！！！